The rapid advancement in technology has paved the way for the development of personalized education platforms that cater to the unique learning styles and needs of individual students. Adaptive learning systems (ALS), a key component of these platforms, are designed to dynamically adjust the content, pace, and resources offered to each student based on their performance and learning patterns. This paper explores the concept of ALS within the context of personalized education platforms, focusing on their ability to enhance learning outcomes and foster student engagement. Through an analysis of existing literature and case studies, this study highlights the benefits of incorporating ALS into educational settings, such as improved learning efficiency, personalized learning experiences, and the potential for scalability. Furthermore, it discusses the challenges faced by educators and developers in implementing effective ALS, including data privacy concerns and the need for continuous system improvement. Overall, this paper underscores the significance of adaptive learning systems in shaping the future of personalized education and encourages further research in this domain to maximize the potential of these innovative technologies.
White, E. Adaptive Learning Systems for Personalized Education Platforms. Information Sciences and Technological Innovations, 2019, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.isti.20190930
AMA Style
White E. Adaptive Learning Systems for Personalized Education Platforms. Information Sciences and Technological Innovations; 2019, 1(1):2. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.isti.20190930
Chicago/Turabian Style
White, Emily 2019. "Adaptive Learning Systems for Personalized Education Platforms" Information Sciences and Technological Innovations 1, no.1:2. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.isti.20190930
APA style
White, E. (2019). Adaptive Learning Systems for Personalized Education Platforms. Information Sciences and Technological Innovations, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.69610/j.isti.20190930
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chinn, C. A., & editors. (2014). The nature of learning: Evidence and implications for design. New York: Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). Two approaches to the design of adaptive learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 174-199.
VanLehn, K. (1996). The science of intelligent tutoring systems. In G. Reisberg & L. vanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: An introduction (pp. 3-57). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
VanLehn, K. (2000). The augmented intellect: How computers are changing our minds. New York: Perseus Books.
, M., & Huang, Z. (2005). A review of intelligent tutoring systems research: From models and methods to design and delivery. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 68-86.
Siemens, G. (2009). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 32-40.
Kali, Y., & Baker, R. S. (2006). A review of personalized learning systems. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 93-120.
Chatti, M., & Thalheim, B. (2011). A systematic review of learning analytics: A reference model and set of evaluation criteria. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 102-112.
Hazzan, O., Tardos, K., & Lai, S. (2009). An analysis of the impact of intelligent tutoring systems on learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 178-191.
Baker, R. S., King, K. A., & McKeachie, W. J. (2010). Learning and motivation: Measuring what matters in higher education. New York: Routledge.
VanLehn, K. (2013). A review of the research on intelligent tutoring systems. In J. A. people (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to artificial intelligence (pp. 349-376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Golle, P. (2011). Privacy and big data: The challenges of managing data as an asset in the cloud era. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 3(1), 1-13.
Fried, M. N., & Karpinski, A. C. (2013). The portability of learning: Do students benefit from online learning? Computers & Education, 66, 3-14.
VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., & VanLehn, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of the differences between tutoring systems and human tutors. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 435-482.
Schmid, R., Schreier, P., & Hitzler, P. (2012). The potential of automated personalized learning: A research-based review. Computers & Education, 59(3), 927-939.
Siemens, G., & Rose, T. (2013). Big data for education: Potentials, promises, and perils. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Information and Computer Science (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Whelan, B. (2014). Big data in education: The potential and the pitfalls. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(2), 135-151.